Pages

Saturday 2 May 2020

Security,Privacy Issues with Zoom


By Nsikan Nkordeh
I know that many people, especially the working class, are familiar with Zoom.The COVID-19 pandemic has made it impossible for workplaces all over the world to open, re-defining how work is done ; people now work remotely using various online meeting platforms like Cisco Webex Zoom, GoToMeeting, ReadyTalk,OnStreamMeeting,Join.Me, ezTalks Meetings etc. All of these, Zoom seem to be the more popularly used one among medium and small corporate users(to me Cisco Webex is the best in terms of security).It was reported that the earnings of the founder of Zoom, Eric Yuan increased by $4B between January and April 2020! The man literally 'hammered'. Yes, millions have moved over to Zoom as a virtual workplace and official rendezvous

Yuan in an interview said they had 400 million users, a claim they were forced to withdrew.In actually fact Zoom has about 220 million users as at the end of April 2020.As corporate entities, Universities, individuals moved to Zoom because of its cost (cheaper than Cisco Webex) and flexibility, issues of security and privacy have been raised especially in America.These concerns are really issue-based.Zoom has it servers in China! You know what that means to America and their Intellectual Property(IP).Apart from this, Zoom has shown to be very unsafe as it deploys a very weak encryption scheme; Zoo uses the Electronic Codebook(ECB) mode of operation in building its encryption, a method that is insecure and easily can easily be hacked.This may account for the attack on zoom, termed "zoombombing", where unauthorized users showed up in a meeting uninvited.This was a serious security breach.That means during very important corporate meetings, intruders could access the meeting and listen to company's strategy and plans.

When using zoom, you are advised to be as formal as possible, private chats between people are not actually private, as the host of the meeting can later have access to such communication(You do not want to be caught joking or making inappropriate comments with a friend,through chats, during meeting). Users of Zoom thinks their private communication with others during meetings are confidential, but this is not so.Zoom should be responsible enough to alert users that their private chats may not be safe.
Zoom claims to be using end-to-end encryption(E-2-E), a claim that is untrue. End-to-end encryption means "that Zoom calls are encrypted at all points in the data creation, transfer, and reception lifecycle – and that Zoom itself is unable to access that critical data. End-to-end encryption is the gold standard, and it means that keys are generated and managed on endpoints, and are never accessible by Zoom’s servers"[1].This claim by Zoom is not true as Zoom through its servers have access to the encryption keys and can perform the decryption whenever it wants to.What this means is that if Zoom wants listen to listen to your meeting during or after the meeting, they have the encryption keys.That is a scary thing for American companies, recalling that Zoom has its main servers on Chinese soil.With the mutual suspicion between America and China, and the long age accusation from the Americans that China steals IP from them, using Zoom may be a matter of national security.The Google-Chinese fights in the late 2000s is still very fresh in our memory.One company that uses E-2-E encryption is Apple.The iPhone is the safest brand of phones, your encryption keys reside in your phone, not with Apple nor your network, hence it is almost impossible to get it hacked.
To know more about how you can secure yourself and your corporations, follow my cyber security articles on Linkedin and Twitter @nkordeh



Thursday 18 July 2013

WARNING! WARNING! WARNING-MOTHERS AND PARENTS BE WARNED;PEDOPHILE SENATORS ON THE LOOSE!!!!


The 'unhallowed' Chamber of the Nigeria Senator has set in motion a law that may return the Country to Stone-Age, a law that was not even accepted in Medieval times-they have just given licence to the Chief Pedophile,Sani Yerima to go about marrying underage girls and toddlers, a law which is worse than same-sex marriage. I am against same-sex marriage ,and have written a lot about it; but marriage to underage girls and toddlers which your psychopathic, lunatic and pedophiliac Senators have approved is worse. Why? In same-sex marriage, you have two sexually aberrant adults agreeing to engage in madness(  this is a mutually agreed action).In under-age marriage, we have a lunatic and pedophile whose mental faculty has been eroded by lust, lasciviousness and all sort of extreme sexually debauchery forcing themselves on toddlers who do not know their right from left, using their ill-gotten wealth to blind the eyes and reasoning of insane and morally corrupt parents.

Marriage of under-age toddlers is the worst form of rape because these girls are being forced against their will by 'dogs and goats' in human body. What is the difference between a goat who sleeps with his mother, sisters with these lunatics that marry toddlers.

I call on all men of goodwill to write against this madness and madmen. There are enough adult women to be married, why are these pedophiles so interested in such banal acts if not for the fact that they are lunatics( another reason may be that of fetish rituals, which most of them are involved).
The Nigeria Senate is a House made up of morally depraved men and women, reprobates in terms of morals and ethics(though there may be a remnant that still has  conscience and morals).You would not expect me to have any iota of respect to these stone-age ,medieval Homo sapiens ,who have lost all sense of shame; you don't expect me to use nice words on those that are giving license to pedophiles to abuse our girls...no..I refuse to be politically correct!

How can I be proud to be called a Nigerian, when the President, a 'Charted' Zoo Keeper has turned our Country into a Jungle, a Banana republic where laws are meant for the weak and poor while they strode the landscape like Colossuses ,committing all forms of impunities and violations; a Country where five Executive Governors could be held hostage by scalawags and the police stand afar watching.
You do not expect me to be proud to be Nigerian, a Country where the President and his lieutenant of Kleptomaniacs have dipped their hands to the National till, stolen us black and have incurred a debt of about N5.8trillion in less than four years..no you don't really expect me to be proud of such.

I patiently and earnest wait God's intervention on my dear Nigeria; a intervention that will bring these political Savages to book, a divine cleansing of the political stable with the blood of all these evil men dripping down the Sword of Justice. I await an intervention! Probably, we are at the threshold, the cups of these Lunatics have just run full, and about to overflow!

I see Judgment in the land, and these political scalawags will be consumed in it. Unfortunately, some innocent will be affected but no Righteous will be among-it is not enough to be innocent, but ensure you are righteous!

Thursday 17 January 2013

2015 ELECTIONS -ELECTRONIC VOTING, THE ONLY WAY OUT by Nsikan Nkordeh



Organizing a free and fair election is not rocket science..it is a simple as A,B,C but the PDP will not allow it because they know in a free and fair election they will lose.

2015 is coming , elections would be conducted; parties in the opposition are threatening fire, thunders, brimstone and acid if the elections are rigged. Some have even said they won't go to courts anymore as both winners and losers of the election would not enjoy their 'victories'. There is a grim  expectation as the unity of Nigeria is greatly threatened.2015 could make or mar Nigeria if not well handled.

The race to 2015 is really polarizing the country, and any attempt by PDP and Jonathan to rig or manipulate the 2015 election would be disastrous and may plunge the Country into blood shed...that is the reason I am writing this short piece
The only way to convince the people and the opposition that an election is free and fair is by deploying electronic voting. Since the mutual suspicion in the system is so high, no amount of credibility done on paper voting will convince the opposition-this is quite unfortunate..In Nigeria, anyone who loses election claim they have been rigged, whether true or not. No candidate ever accepts defeat in Nigeria because they believe the system is highly corrupt and manipulated. Their fears can be justified based on the antecedents of the past elections from 1999, through 2003, through 2007 and 2011-these elections especially the 2007 and 2011 were grossly marred by crude and scientific rigging, and judiciary validation of the fraud. Hence, the present cries from the opposition is understandable. But the greatest threat is that the opposition will only accept the elections in which they emerge winners as free and fair; anything otherwise would be seen as rigged. On this premise, I say the opposition is wrong. Only accepting elections that are won by you as free and fair, is prejudicial and wrong. The PDP are not ready to relinquish power, whether in a free and fair or rigged elections; and the opposition is not ready to accept any elections that PDP wins as free and fair..hence we have a dangerous political stalemate that may drown the Country waiting to happen..The oppositions have agreed to present a common front in 2015 believing they will wrestle power out from the PDP at all cost, and the PDP is busy re-engineering themselves to win again at all cost. It is important that Nigerians see that this dangerous stalemate that will take place in 2015 be broken now by consciously developing voting methods that will be accepted to all.
This is why I am proposing Electronic Voting in 2015

2015 being a watershed election year should be taken seriously , and all preparations at making it free and fair to both winners and losers should not be taken for granted. Any attempt by the ruling party/class to rig, manipulate or stage-manage the 2015 election may cause a conflagration in the Country
Electronic voting is the only solution to this..it simple, not easily tampered with, and the results are transparent for all to see, and contentions can be easily traced. Electronic voting can be easily implemented in Nigeria, and would cost less than the N108B Prof. Jega squandered in 2011 .Electronic voting will eliminated the voters register manipulation, ballot-stuffing and snatching, multiple voting and result manipulation between election centres and collation points.
To avoid contention, Nigerian should insist that the 2015 election be conducted using electronic voting. To have electronic voting it is simple, what we need is a centralized database where all voters' data have been captured and stored. INEC claims that we have about 120,000 pooling units in the Country. With this we require 2 voting machines per unit( made up of a laptop and a touch-screen voting pad) ; these laptops would have a voting software that are connected directly to the central database by internet. To vote, a voter would have to put his thumb on the column of the party/and picture of the party/candidate of his choice, and this is immediately transmitted to the Central database. At the end of the election, the results is read directly from the central database and the winner is declared based on that.
It is that simple !The cost of implementing electronic voting will be much cheaper than the N108B Jega squandered. Since there are about 120,000 polling units, and about 2 voting machines are needed per voting unit, a total of 240,000 pieces of Voting Machines will be needed. The Voting Machine is a simple computer with voting software installed, connected touch-screen pad that displays the parties/candidates' picture. Since 240,000 pieces would be needed, we can assume a unit price of N100,000 at bulk price. When the calculation is done, it will amount to N24B ! The other cost will be that of getting data stick about N7,000 per unit will amount to N1.68B for 240,000 units..The other cost will be the  setting up cost of the data centre which should be handled by international Enterprise organization like IBM , SAP etc

Electronic voting is the only way to ensure elections that will be accepted by all since the level of human manipulations will be greatly reduced. Electronic voting will be cheaper , more transparent and less time consuming than the present paper voting, and any manipulation can easily be traced.
The Nigeria elite will not want any process that will eliminate their influence, they will resist any platform that will emasculate their god-fatherism power. They want to be power brokers without responsibility  ..in electronic voting, the fate of candidates depends on their electoral value of that candidates and their acceptance by the electorates..electronic voting will ensure that the electoral box is the only platform for changing leadership.
In Nigeria, we make simple matters complex..things that should be straightforward and easy are entangled in webs of complexities..To have a free and fair elections that are accepted by all, the only way forward is the use electronic voting. We have more than 2 years to prepare for this, and there is enough time to implement this.
If Prof. Jega, President Goodluck  Jonathan and the PDP are sincere about their readiness to conduct an election where the  wishes of the people will be respected, and eliminate unnecessary litigations and manipulations, the way to go is electronic voting. This is simple to implement, does not request much high expertise, and does not need much logistics of carrying heavy voting materials.

If Prof. Jega, President Jonathan and PDP think this is impossible, we are ready to give them an elaborate presentation, with business case and implementation timelines for bringing this about. There are tens and hundreds of reputable international firms that can implement this solution easily.
It is our right to demand for a truly free and fair election, and come 2015 we MUST have a truly free and fair election .

Thursday 3 January 2013

ARISE O COMPATRIOTS by Nsikan Nkordeh




"Nigeria is the only country this generation has to call their own..."

This was the statement made by the Iconic Buhari when he delivered his speech after taking over in 1983

This is true.

Nigerians this is the only Country we have to call our own and we have to fight and redeem her from the hands of the corrupt political class

Some people have dual citizenship, others tri-citizenship and can run to other Countries if anything evil happens, but for many of us that only have the Nigeria citizenship we have to ensure that this Country is made habitable for us and our children

We have no alternative, we have no plan-B country, Nigeria is the only land  we have..

Compatriots, it is time we put aside genuinely, tribal, religious and ethnic sentiments, galvanize our thoughts and action together, form a common front and deliver this Country from the political vampires that are feeding on the blood of Nigeria

This is the only Country I have, I don't intend to change my citizenship, and i dont intend Nigeria to continue in the scum-like situation that we have been plunge into by men of low virtue

I call on all Nigerians to re-dedicate their lives to the emancipation of this great Country, we should come together, strategize on how to deliver the Country.i dream of a Nigeria where merit and competence will be the  measure and standard ,and not connection,tribalism nepotism, cronyism or godfatherism  ; a Country where the Judiciary will dispense justice to the poor, the rich, the low and the mighty; a Country where my president would not treat the citizens with high-handedness and contempt, a Country where the law makers will make laws that are in the interest of the masses ,not vested interest!

Compatriots, I want us not to be short-sighted in this Nigerian project; because you and I have a good job or business now does not mean all is well, we have a total collapse of the institutions that sustain a society; i want you and I to think of our children,grandchildren and posterity,If we don't fix this mess, they may also come under the same conditions if not worse; the plan of this evil, vampirical political elites is to ensure that the masses continue to serve their own children-we must reject this.

Our future is in our hands, and really at stake if we become indifferent, believing that just prayers could help-faith without work is dead, says the holy Bible.Compatriots and comrades, I use this medium to encourage us to be politically inclined.If you decide to be apolitical, you have handed over your destiny to others to determine..Note, everything about life is politics..Whether you have a job this year or not is politics..whether your business prospers is politics..whether you live in security or not is politics..hence you can't decide to be apolitical

I am not saying everyone should join politics, but i am saying each and everyone of us must make their voices heard when things that affect us are discussed.We have to become politically conscious- just putting up a short write up condemning a reckless spending goes a long way, questioning cost of project by challenging the costing goes a long way..I am more concerned about my children, and i think all of us have to..we have to demand for institutionally reforms

Institutional reforms that will ensure that the system works irrespective of who is there. Nigeria needs more of strong institutions than strong leaders, but first we need strong leaders that will be bold to ensure strong institutions are built.Without a functional institutional framework, your future and mine and that of our children will be left to chance, connection and all other unfair measures..Strong institutions will ensure that the best always emerge..strong institutions will always reward merit and competence , instead of mediocrity.

Nigeria is at the threshold, at the watershed of history, at a crossroad of destiny..men and women of courage and character are needed to remould and redirect this great Country to prosperity, men and women like you and I are needed..will you make yourselves available?

Nigeria shall flourish again, and it shall be in my life time..Amen

Monday 15 October 2012

Excerpt of Meeting between Chief Awolow/team and Chief Ojukwu/team at state House, Enugu on Satureday 6th May 1967.


His Excellency: This a very important day and I would like to be a little bit formal. I think the first thing is to congratulate you, sir, for your good health. Since your release we have not really had the opportunity to meet although I have been looking forward to it for a long time. I would also like to thank Chief Mariere and Chief Onyia for this trip. And, of course, I will not forget to thank my old friend, Professor Sam Aluko. It is a pleasure to have you all with us today.

Having said that, I would like to introduce the people who are with me here (And he introduced Lt. Col. Imo, Lt. Col. Effiong, Lt. Col Kurubo, Mr. C.O Majekwu, Mr. N.U Akpan, Professor Eni Njoku, Dr. Nwakanma Okoro, Dr. P.N.C Okigbo, Mr. C.A Onyegbale, and Mr. Ndem).

When I heard you were coming on this delegation, as usual, I halted everything and then started to think. I thought of it the whole of yesterday up to this morning trying to see really how to conduct this discussion. You all realise the difficulty in which we are placed in the East. We have been virtually isolated since July so that we do not know what is happening very much on the other side. Indeed every day makes us more isolated. So, we do not really understand the platform and the reason for this type of Committee. I, therefore, finally decided that the answer would be to leave you, sirs, the visitors, to let me know perhaps in more detail the reasons or the points which you want us to discuss. It is only after that , that perhaps we would be in a position to really join in the discussions. At this stage, I would like to welcome you once again. We are very happy indeed to have you with us.

Chief Awolowo: We thank you very much indeed for the cordial way in which you have received us. Four of us here were invited to a meeting of what was later described as the National conciliation Committee and before we went to the meeting we were made clearly to understand that the purpose was to try and find ways and means of bringing an end to the present impasse in the country. At the meeting we tried to get the purpose properly defined but we did not go very far even with that because the East was not represented or may I qualify that a little bit, because there were two natives of the Eastern Region at that meeting, but we felt they could not properly represent the East because they have not been here for quite a long time...

I had a number of matters in my mind in addition to what the convener had stated but we felt that if we proceeded with the points raised at the meeting we might fail because we were not properly represented. We felt that the East must be present and so we decided not to proceed further with the meeting until we have succeeded in getting the Eastern Region representatives at the meeting.

The purpose of this visit, therefore, is not to go onto another detail as to what your grievances are because these are political issues and the solution must be political. Of course, I agree with my friend Chief Mariere, that there are also human problems and there must be human approach to them. Instead of going into the grievances we felt it would be easier to have a list of what each Region would like to see done in order to resolve the friction and fears of the past and then work together in some form of harmony. Our main concern is to ensure that Nigeria does not disintegrate, and at this stage I have to project my own person further, and I did say that I would like to see Nigeria bound together by any bond because it is better than breaking the whole place up because I think each unit will be the loser for it. The economy of the country is so integrated that I think it is too late in the day to try and sever them without risking the death of one or both of them.. So, we have come, therefore, to appeal to you to let Eastern representatives attend the meeting of the committee.
2-contd:You are in no way committed and, if my word is worth anything at all, I would like to assure you that you are in no way committed to any particular course of action. Whoever represents the Easter Region will let us know on what terms Eastern Region would like to participate in future Nigeria. Of course, each Region would have to state its own terms and then it would be the duty of the Committee to know that these are the lines we propose to pursue and to assemble those lines and then move from Region to Region.... If we consider any of these terms to be excessive the we shall come here to see if we can reduce it to a minimum and try to see how to reconcile all the demands, and in the end it is our wish that it should be possible for the Military Leaders to meet here in Nigeria and say, this is that, I can understand your feelings in the matter.

I don’t not know what reasons you have to insist that Heads of African States should be present at the future meeting of the Military Governors, but when our Military Governor of the West visited you at Onitsha and told me what transpired between you, I told him that if I were you I would hesitate to meet with the Military Council without making sure of a guarantee of my safety, but to invite African Heads of State is entirely a different matter.

I think that now that we have started this, and with your co-operation in the early stage, I feel that the Supreme Military Council can meet in Nigeria without the presence of any African Head of State.

At the moment, what we have come for is to appeal to you to attend the next meeting of the National Reconciliation Committee and to assure you that if anything is done at the Committee which tends to compromise your stand or commit your people of this Region, there are some of us who will have the courage to get out of the Committee before it is too late. So, these are there reasons for our visit.
........................

His Excellency: It does appear to me that there are two main issues in this matter. The first one is the matter of our Eastern representatives going to the Reconciliation Committee; then, of course the main thing is the problem of Nigeria.

If I may, I would like to deal first with the question of our representatives going to this meeting. This point really, by virtue of the term, does not arise because they are not representing us. They cannot in any way be our representatives, and one starts wondering how the names were arrived at. I say this knowing full we that this Nigerian problem started ever since we conceived Independence and was only held up in the past year, and certainly have been boiling since July till now. I find it difficult to consider any Nigerian not involved. Certainly I feel every Easterner is involved. I feel too that for any objective consideration to be given to this, one really needs completely new areas because, as you said, the Eastern stand is well known and the Western stand have been made quite clear, indeed, in a very classic manner. The Mid-West stand, I am not quite sure of since the latest developments. The Northern stand has been made crystal clear.

Now, in this situation as I was saying, there is nobody that is a Nigerian who can say he can be dispassionate. And, therefore, to discuss the future of Nigeria, it would appear to me that those who should discuss must have the mandate of the people.

The second point arises from your introduction of the membership of the committee; the way and manner the people were elected, and who they were show that again there was a design to make it impossible for Easterner to attend.

A point which we feel very strongly about here in the East is the point about the judiciary. Here we feel really that the judiciary is sacrosanct. We have made a point about this and we do not feel the Chief Justice of the East (indeed he finds it difficult) should go into this thing. As the Justice he just does not play, and I think you are aware too that the difficulties Nigeria is suffering now come through two justices getting involved in politics and trying to solve the Nigeria problem. They have tried twice and failed.

I think the other invitee to the Committee was Sir Francis, my Adviser. Now, I am the Military Governor. As you see, I am a young man and Sir Francis is my Adviser. I do what he advices me. If I steal, you can be sure that he advised me to steal, so I don't see how he can fit into this' circumstances make it impossible for him to be associated with this......
3-The first thing that occurred to me through this afternoon is, with all due respects, that we are getting ourselves again involved in platitudes. Men of goodwill, forgive and forget, those sort of terms do not mean anything in this crisis.....

You talk about free movement, children moving from one place to other. I am told that Nigerians move in and out of Western Germany without visas, so that, really, that is not the point at issue. There are arrangements in which you can still move from one place to another without a visa.

After my deadline of 31st of March, came April; I took certain actions. The American Ambassador and the British High Commissioner Cabled back (one good thing about the East is that we have ears) for further instruction from their home Governments. Britain thought that the solution to the problem lay in immediate parity between the North and the East. The U.S.A cabled back that the solution would lie, in order to protect their investments, in checks and balances so as to continue the exploitation of our oil. After this, the British High Commissioner and the Ambassador met and they kept together for a period of some four hours after which the American Ambassador started taking the initiative. What they decided was that the country was on the point of disintegration and that the only way to deal with this thing is to delay so much as possible the East from any further action that might completely disintegrate Nigeria. It was as result of that and the posture of Britain that it was decided that the initiative must be taken by Messrs Omo-Bare, Fabunmi and Yesufu who started meeting some individuals and tried getting some individuals to meet together, having cleared that with Gowon. So that when we discuss the Conciliation Committee, the child of that conspiracy, you must realise that our interests are not really being considered; the interests being considered are America and British interests.

I started off this struggle in July with 120 rifles to defend the entirety of the East. I took my stand knowing full well that by doing so, whilst carving my name in history, I was signing also my death warrant. But I took it because I believed that this stand was vital to the survival of the South. I appealed for settlement quietly because I understood that his was a naked struggle for power and that the only time we can sit down and decide the future of Nigeria on basis of equality will always be equality of arms. Quietly I build up. If you do not know it, I am proud, and my officers are proud, that here in the East we possess the biggest army in Black Africa. I am no longer speaking as an underdog; I am speaking from a position of power. We have really go to find a solution to our problem. It is not my intention to unleash the destruction which my army can unleash. It is not my intention to fight unless I am attacked. If I am attacked I will take good care of the aggressor. That is why i really believe that our future must be for the people of the South to halt a while and think, so that whilst we are catching up something which is already written to the core, that is association with the North, we do not lose more of the things that keep us in the South together....

I went to Aburi as a Nigerian (I am glad that there is complete record of our meeting). I did not ask for compensation; I asked for a solution to the Nigerian problem. What I asked for in Aburi was share of power in Nigeria. It is significant that you said that five months ago we started getting popularity May I add to that, that what is happening today in this country is precisely five months late...

I noticed today that the main difficulties precluding the participation of the East have not been touched. I said that we were being strangulated; anybody would then expect that the first thing to do is to take hands of this people's throat before anything else.
4-Chief Awolowo; You are speaking figuratively.

His Excellency: Do I have to enumerate all the things, the economic strangulations and all, that is being imposed on us by Gowon.

Chief Awolowo We cannot go there and be the advocates of the East I was selected to represent the West, and therefore, it will not be right for me to go there and advocate for the East.

I refused to be on this delegation because I was accused of speaking to you on telephone every day. Gowon himself told me that I visited the East several times and on one occasion you threw a cocktail party in my honour.

I do not want to put myself in a position where I will be treated as an advocate of the Eastern cause. Let the Eastern delegates go there, make their case and then as a member of the Committee I will get up and say I support this entirely. But for me to go there and say that this is the grievance of the East is wrong. I enumerated to you what I have in mind. I have a lot of things in mind.

May I make a correction here, please? I do not indulge in platitudes. I am sure that when it comes to demonstrating our sincerity we shall certainly not fail. This is different from what happened last year when your delegates came to Lagos; this time we are faced as it were, with reality and we have to face them or be swallowed up and time is running against us because you said you were being strangulated and I know what you mean. If we get back to that meeting and your people are represented, I know what ought to be done immediately to ease the situation on all sides and I have made my views known about certain Regions of the Country.

Many years before this crisis started in 1962, if only some of my contemporaries had united with me in attitude, I suppose all this would never have happened; but we are making history and we can count ourselves as lucky for having the opportunity of making history. Since we are meeting tomorrow I think it is good to sleep over this.

You have spoken of some irrevocable stands that you have taken. Has the East taken an irrevocable stand not to have anything at all to do with the North? Is this stand of the East (because it will be good for us to know the stand of the East), not to have anything to do with the North revocable or not? Can we have circumstances or conditions under which the East can deal with the North? I believe if you still want an association among all the units of Nigeria, that will satisfy the yearnings of the South including the East. I would like to know whether it is your view that the East will secede from the rest of Nigeria. I would like to know if these so that we will be in a position to make constructive contributions.

His Excellency: On the specific question of whether there is a possibility of contract with the North, the answer is at the battle field. On the question of secession, it will never come from me that we wish to secede from the rest of the country, that is, I am really thinking of the South.

I believe very strongly that there is a great deal we can do together and believe me, Sirs, if we have to opt out then it will be because we cannot get together in the South, that is, opting out of the remaining of the South.

The Second day session of the meeting held at State House, Enugu on Sunday 7th May. 1967. It started at about 11.50 am and adjourned at about 2.15pm.
5-His Excellency (Ojukwu): I think we may start now. We had a very good meeting yesterday and certainly the sum total gave us plenty to think about and indeed, those of us who do not take supper actually did have quite a lot of food for thought. I think if we can go on from where we left off and that is again having cleared our minds of various attitudes, to think about this question of the peace committee.

It was established yesterday that the Peace Committee as composed was not desirable, that is from the Eastern point of view. It was neither desirable nor had it any chance of success. We said that there was need to discuss but we did not establish what and who should discuss and I think that actually would be the starting point for today.

We talked very sketchily about relative positions of the various regions and we projected a possibility of an understanding between the Southern Regions of Nigeria. The last two questions on which we closed were, first, the Eastern attitude to the North which I said was one where there could only be a meeting on the battle field. The second question was the Eastern attitude towards future association. Here again, I said that; the East does not intend to secede but if pushed would not hesitate to take the challenge knowing full well that the East is in position militarily and politically within itself to take this decision and not be pushed or helped. I think on that really the meeting came to a close and we thought that today we would go on.

I talked a great deal yesterday and did lot of thinking too. I think it would only be fair if I again leave the floor open for your respected delegates to put up suggestions for this Peace Committee.

Chief Awolowo: Thank you very much; I have two or three submissions to make. First, of all, I think that there is no doubt that the Regions south of the country have always been working together and have shared common ideals by and large, and that the only thing that has bedeviled Southern Solidarity in the past was individual ambition. But individually we can bring that solidarity about by working together in the same bodies and meetings. How do we bring about the solidarity if the East and ourselves have no chance of meeting?

There is a good deal of suspicion right now, and we want to avoid it as much as possible, that some of us are in conspiracy with you and you know that is not true. I have been accused of talking to you on the telephone but I think the last time I spoke to you on the telephone was in October last year, and this is my first visit to the Region since my release in August last year. Not that one is afraid of being accused falsely, but certainly I do not want to put myself in a difficult position where I could not exert some influence to bring about a final settlement to the present stalemate. That is why I want to avoid anything that will make people suspect me of being in conspiracy. But here we have a chance of meeting. Chief Mariere and I have not had chance of meeting since my release. We met casually at Ado Ekiti when we went for the funeral of Lt. Col. Fajuyi, but since this meeting we have talked together several times and this morning we had preliminary discussions and exchanged views on what happened yesterday and it surprised me that the areas of agreement between the West and the Mid-West are very wide. What brought this about? It is the Peace Committee meeting. If I did not attend the meeting of this Committee I would have been accused of conspiracy, of being against either the North, the Mid-West or the East. But this Peace Committee gives us a chance of meeting and talking together. I have no doubt that if your delegates come to the meeting, after the meeting, it does not matter who were at the meeting, we can then say, 'what about meeting at such and such a place tomorrow morning' and then sit down and see how we can bring about Southern solidarity.

I said to Chief Mariere and Professor Aluko last night that if we can afford to go to this meeting and say this is what we want for a new Nigeria whether temporarily or permanently, and the North says 'no, we are not going to have it', I will go out and address a World Press Conference and send our case to that body and say this is what we have done and the North has turned it down. I will then take any step that is necessary to bring into effect what we want. But certainly this cannot be done if only the Mid-West and West and Lagos are represented at that meeting. It will be plain case of conspiracy.

Not that I take some of these newspaper comments seriously, but a lot of things are written in the 'Post' which is a Government sponsored paper. When I said that I have not been to the East they said; 'What about Professor Aluko, what about a school teacher who goes regularly to represent you?' These are the sort of things said but the thing is that we want to have a chance of meeting and we want you to give us that facility. We want you to allow the East to make its own case before that body.
6-You said yesterday, that nobody, is being sponsored by the Americans and the British. I do not trust that. If I have something to do in this country today. I will take Nigeria out of the Commonwealth within 40 hours, I do not want to go to reasons now. I will have nothing to do with the British. They are full of prejudices and they have not learned from history, and having nothing to teach anybody I recently refused to talk to the British High Commissioner. You have the patience to talk to them. The other day he sent a message through that he wanted to come and see me and I told him that there was no chance because we have no common interests. As for the Americans we know that wherever they sink their dollars their interests lie. They have no principle in their activities. But let them be behind convening this meeting. They did that with Alhaji Tafawa Balewa before; where is he now? They did also with Chief Akintola; where is he now?

I have no doubt that truth will prevail no matter what you do, the side of truth will be equally vigilant. Once that is the case, one shall never lose. IF YOU ARE ON THE SIDE OF TRUTH AND YOU ARE CARELESS AND UNINTELLIGENT OR LAZY, THEN YOU LOOSE BY DEFAULT. (capital emphasis mine). So that is my first appeal.

I have no doubt that you believe in Southern solidarity, but we cannot bring it about if the East cannot associate with the West. So, forget about Sir Adetokunbo Ademola and other members of the Committee; we dislike them more than you do, but the thing is that this meeting will provide a forum for regular contact between your people and our people.

The second observation I want to make is this. I notice that you feel very strongly about the presence of Sir Adetokunbo in that meeting. I think we all appreciate your position. We certainly will take that back but from what I noticed of him in that meeting I am inclined to think that if we get back and say, ' You are not wanted in this meeting', he will fade out especially if we say. 'Here are Eastern delegates, and here we are from the West and Mid-West and we think that you should fade away in this meeting. (We do not need to put it in the paper that you are here) otherwise, we will not be able to go on with this meeting', he will fade out.

If you also insist, that is the third point, that we should have this meeting in Benin, it will only depend on how soon. If Sir Francis is one of your delegates, he is welcome anywhere in this country: if it is Professor Njoku who was member of the Ad Hoc Committee (because you made that point yesterday about the delegates who were members of the Ad Hoc Committee); Professor Njoku is welcome anywhere in this country. No harm will come to your delegates. But if you insist that it should be in Benin, we will come to Benin. Yesterday Chief Onyia suggested Asaba. I think that would be asking too much from the Northern delegates. So, we want you to give us the chance of presenting the case of the South in a concerted form to the North. I would not like to treat the North as one for this purpose; there are certain elements in the North who want to dominate not only the East, the West and the Mid-West but also certain sections of the Northern Region. These are the people who constitute the enemies of Nigeria and we really would like to give them a showdown. But this does not mean military actions; we do not want any more coups, friction and so on. We want to maintain the link among all the Regions. But if we present the case of the South and they say, 'no, this does not suit us' very well it suits the South and we take appropriate action.

His Excellency (Ojukwu); If I might come in there. There is persistence on this and the impression is that if the South says this and the North says the opposite, you know, we start feeling that then the crisis really starts.

Chief Awolowo; The Crisis is already on. What has not taken place so far is that the North has not been in a position of being presented with the United front of the South. The East has been speaking so far, the Mid-West has been speaking, and the West has been speaking, but there is no concerted action among us. If the North understands that the South is united, it would make a lot of difference.
7-His Excellency (Ojukwu): This leads to the next point of observation that, therefore, the only way for the South really to present that united front is for the South to meet and hammer out that united front. It is a point which must be cleared first before proceeding to make a statement of whatever it is. That is why, to my mind at the present stage of the crisis the ideal thing for the Southern people to meet in any platform and discuss and hammer out any differences they might have. Then going further, it would then mean that to do this the South must take the initiative, because the North will not allow the South to meet; because if we wait for their permission, we wait forever. We have to think of this crisis objectively, realise our vital interests and take the bull by the horns. I see no reason indeed why the South should not come together. We have been suggesting this for so long, that the Southern leaders could meet at Asaba too. Once we do this, there is hope for the future.

There is a slight alternative; if we find it impossible because people are going to label us conspirators, and I can understand the reason for the feeling, then the alternative may be for the South in their groupings to say the same thing. After all, the whole of the South has been consulted on the platform of different units making their points and indeed, Sir, when you spoke and made your statement, first your letter, then your statement, the report abroad was that the East and the West were united. If the Mid-West considers that the stand which the East and the West have taken is the stand which they ought to take and say the same thing, then outside they will say that the South is united. If this cannot be achieved, then perhaps the only alternative if for the East to decide its own fate and perhaps to move out of the Federation for the West, finding Northern protection intolerable, to equally move out of the Federation, and for the Mid-West once again finding itself in the belly of the North, to decide to eat out of it, and for us knowing our vital interests, to meet and hammer out a form of association. Sometimes that appears rather attractive because it starts on the basis of absolute equality and we meet and freely put into the melting-pot things we think we can afford to put into it. I find that quite interesting.

Finally, the question of venue, I notice how all talks about venue point to the Mid-West. If there is a true feeling that there should be peace, after all these people claim to have a sizable following in the East, in view of our won suspicions an things making it difficult for all the people we would like to be present at such meetings to beheld, since there are just a few who can in fact be welcomed anywhere, then perhaps in their so called stronghold of the minorities. We can hold meetings in Calabar, in Port Harcourt which they say is Rivers; I am sure we hold a meeting in Ogoja which is quite near the North. So there are places in the East where these meetings could indeed be held, but talks of venue for meeting are exclusive of the East; I wonder why.

Chief Awolowo: It is also exclusive of the North. Could I put in a word here now? I do appreciate the points you have made, especially the suggestion that the South could take the bull by the horns, convene a meeting of its leaders and work out its salvation. Well, I must say that a number of factors have been overlooked in this regard. I would be quite willing to attend any meeting convened by the leaders of the South in the South, but it must be realised that WE IN THE WEST ARE IN VERY DIFFICULT POSITION AND THERE IS SUCH THING AS TACT IN THIS TYPE OF MATTER. Last year when we went to the Ad Hoc Committee we, or the West laboured under a lot of inhibitions and we had to move rather cautiously because courage does not lie in someone lying on the road and having all the traffic to run him over. At that time all the members of the body-guard of the Military Governor were Northerners; there were over 36,000 soldiers in the whole of the West, most of whom were Northerners, and all of them carried arms. It was under such circumstances that we attended the meeting in Lagos. It is natural that all these soldiers also have their fears occasionally, though they are trained to be fearless. Our Governor was also under some inhibition. At one stage during the course of the Conference I had to speak out against the North because I felt that they thought that because they were in control they could do just what they liked. But in spite of the fact that we laboured under those inhibitions, we did summon up courage, and we did not know why the meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee was postponed before the 17th. It was not because the East was not coming but because I led a delegation to Lt. Col. Gowon on the 7th and at that interview I made it clear on behalf of the West we would not attend any further meetings of the Ad Hoc Committee. Then he said between then and the 17th he would do something. Of course, he didn't and decided to postpone the meeting indefinitely. Well, even now we run a lot of risks by calling upon Northern soldiers to go. This morning I got a word from Ibadan, form the Commanding Officers of the Battalion in Ibadan. We passed our resolutions and Col. Adebayo did very well and gave us certain Yoruba Officers with whom to go and deliver the petition to Lt. Col. Gowon. I did give him an ultimatum up to the 15th of May to remove these Northern soldiers from the West. Of course, he agreed to remove them by the 31st of May, but by the time we returned to Ibadan Northern soldiers had taken up arms and wanted to kill me, to kill Adebayo and all the others. Just now Adebayo does not sleep in his house. Somebody told me that he has not been sleeping in his house. The populace, of course, turned against the Northern Soldiers. They now want to send away their wives and children before they themselves finally leave; I understand they are waiting for transport. I dont know why Adebayo should issue the release that soldiers should not be taunted. But this is the way we have been doing our own quiet fighting. YOU ARE REMOTE FROM THE WEST; YOU ADVANTAGES WHICH WE DO NOT POSSESS. WE CAN NOT RUSH WITHOUT RUSHING TO OUR DEATH AT THE SAME TIME. WE ARE NOT COWARDS IN THE WEST; YOU HAVE TO MOVE CAUTIOUSLY, BECAUSE IF WE DO NOT DO THAT YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE US ALIVE; you would only have monuments all over the place.
8-And may I say in this connection of Southern solidarity. I am sorry to go into what has happened in the past - in 1953 there was an understanding between the banned NCNC, and the banned Action Group, we entered into an agreement, which I hope would be used sometime, to the effect that if the North remained intransigent we would declare a Southern Dominion. This was signed by myself and Zik and I still stand by it. I don't think you need assurance from me that we have a lot in common; but we prefer that you should send your delegates to his meeting, so that we should, known to everyone, enter into negotiations among ourselves and present a common front to the North. Then nobody can accuse us of conspiracy or trying to divide the country into two parts. We want to work for one Nigeria on certain basis which would be agreed to by all of us. You did say that when I spoke people said that the East and West are united. That is the manner of speaking. There are certain points which you hold dear on which we do not agree but if we are able to have a dialogue, certainly there is need for dialogue between the East and the West on the one hand, and between the West and the Mid-West on the other, I think it will help us to have a common basis. It is not enough for us to say that we don’t not like the North. That is a negative approach. I think positive approach will be for us to meet. Unity will last only if it is based on common understanding among us and the basis will start with that meeting, then it would be faced with opposition and then we shall go out and tell the whole world that this is where we stand. And if it is misconstrued the we can hold our meeting initiated in the South. This is the way I see it.

I want you to look at it from our point of view, If there were no Northern soldiers in the West the position would be different. and even if by the time I return home the Northern soldiers have gone I still do not want to be accused of perfidy.

According to the Western Area Commander, Nigeria Army, they are now arranging for transport and my attitude is that if they are anywhere in the West, I will not attend any meeting anywhere even if their cap is left. So, we want you to appreciate that point. As I said before, I want you to give me a chance of meeting your people regularly and Sir Adetokunbo Ademola has provided the forum. Let us resolve our differences and get what we want and quickly too

Monday 8 October 2012

What has Pentecostalism brought to Nigeria ?

The Missionary and Orthodox churches like Catholic, Anglican, Methodist, Baptist came into Nigeria, built schools that could be afforded, built hospitals that could be assessed by the poor and the masses; they had a human face in everything they did.
Many of our present day Pentecostal Pastors were beneficiaries of the humaneness of these missionaries

Now Pentecostalism is the vogue in Nigeria,churches springing up every day with different variant of Pentecostal flavour but what have they brought?

For me, it is really disheartening that the Pentecostal churches are doing the exact opposite of what the orthodox churches did - building secondary schools that are meant only for the rich,building Universities that only the affluent and thieving politicians can afford, celebrating and 'worshiping' materialism, dining with looting government officials and giving them benediction , honoring people based on size of bank account rather than on the character, lack of humaneness

It is time the Pentecostal churches look inward and retrace these erroneous steps; this is not what the LORD Jesus taught us

Food Security- North V South by Nsikan Nkordeh




I have heard a lot of people say that if Nigeria breaks up today, the North will suffer most but that is a lie.The North would survive the split than any other region.Why?

Food security is an issue that many parts of Nigeria apart from the North , do not take seriously.Why did Biafra lose the War? It was simply because of the blockage put on movement of food from the North and west to the East.Hunger decimated the Biafran army and people.The question is 'Is it that the Igbos did not invest in agriculture before the War that they had to rely on the 'enemy' to feed them? Clearly, through the efficacy of the blockage, it can be deduced that they did not invest in Food production.Hence, though they had money and skill to prosecute the war, they did not have the food to keep them alive to be able to use their money and skills!

The same scenario is playing out itself in our time.Many people in the South( West,East and South-South) have threatened that if Nigeria breaks up, the North will suffer most- this is a very poor assessment.Apart from the recent decimation of the North by Boko Haram, the North had remained the Food basket of Nigeria.I perceive somebody saying , it is not true? I know how much sufferings that takes place here in the South when the North Farmers and Cattle rearers go on strike, and refuse to bring food to us.Prices in the market sky-rocket,scarcity everywhere and panic-buying.This shows that in the South we depend on the North for Food.

God forbid, if a war breaks out between the North and the South, people in the South may not survive 6 months of the War because there will be no supply of food from the North to the South. Note: blocking food supply from your end to the enemies is a legitimate strategy of war( I cant imagine feeding my enemies so they can fight me).If there was a war between the North and the South, we should realize here that the most important thing during war is food.In the South, you cant serve your people crude oil for food, and the West would not serve their people academic intelligence .The North that produce most of these foods we eat will  be able to fight for long, and may probably win since the people of the South would have been decimated by hunger and starvation

Food security is the most important security any people can achieve.Any Country that has not attained Food security is an irresponsible one.For now, Nigeria has not attained Food Security but the North is light-years ahead of the South in terms of Food Security

Our leaders, especially in the South should learn a lesson from the Biafra War.Ojukwu and his Military strategists and advisers lost the War, partly because they could not feed their people.The question is this , can we feed our people?